The Supreme Court has granted the Petition for Review in Ghazali v. Brown, an expert report case from Tarrant County. In my quick review of the briefs, it appears that Dr. Ghazali challenged the expert report as insufficient as to him because it only discussed the care of a laser hair removal center. A revised report was then submitted which made a cursory link between Dr. Ghazali and the center. In response, Brown claims that this is not a health care liability claim and no report was required. That, of course, begs the question: If no report was required, why did she file one?
Click here for a link to Electronic Briefs.
Predictability is one of the benefits in laser hair removal because ninety percent of patients have permanent hair loss after an average of three to five sessions.
ReplyDeleteThanks to give me these type of information
ReplyDeleteA Corsico (Milano) un nuovo centro Epělate specializzato nella epilazione definitiva Milano con tecnologia SWT e altri trattamenti della pelle. Eliminazione definitiva dei peli superflui a Buccinasco, Trezzano sul Naviglio, Assago.
ReplyDeleteI found this is an informative and interesting post so i think so it is very useful and knowledgeable.
ReplyDeletefacebook